Aggregates

Aggregates

  • 1. Overview
  • 2. Classification
  • 3. Properties and tests (IS 2386)
  • 4. Fine aggregate grading (IS 383:2016)
  • 5. Coarse aggregate grading (typical)
  • 6. Moisture and absorption corrections
  • 7. Fineness modulus
  • 8. Common issues and fixes
  • 9. Sustainability notes
  • 10. RCA guidance
  • 11. Consultant checklist
  • 12. Standards and references
  • Disclaimer
🧭

Purpose: consultant-ready reference on aggregates for concrete. Use the TOC to jump to classification, properties and tests, grading, moisture corrections, QA, and standards.

1. Overview

Aggregates constitute up to 75% of concrete volume and strongly influence workability, strength, shrinkage, and durability. Well-graded, clean aggregates lower permeability and cracking risk.

2. Classification

Type
Description
Examples
Common use
By size
Fine ≤ 4.75 mm. Coarse > 4.75 mm.
River/M‑sand; 10, 20, 40 mm stone
FA for cohesion/void fill; CA for skeleton
By source
Natural, manufactured, recycled
River sand, M‑sand, RCA
PCC/mortar, RCC, non‑structural
By density
Normal, light, heavy
Granite; expanded clay; barite
General; lightweight fills; shielding

3. Properties and tests (IS 2386)

Property
Significance
IS reference
Typical acceptance
Specific gravity
Density indicator
IS 2386 (Pt 3)
2.6–2.9
Water absorption
Porosity
IS 2386 (Pt 3)
< 2% (CA), < 3% (FA)
Aggregate impact value
Shock resistance
IS 2386 (Pt 4)
< 30% (RCC)
Crushing value
Load-bearing
IS 2386 (Pt 4)
< 30%
Abrasion (Los Angeles)
Wear resistance
IS 2386 (Pt 4)
< 35%
Flakiness + elongation
Particle shape
IS 2386 (Pt 1)
< 30% combined
ASR reactivity
Expansion potential
IS 2386 (Pt 7)
Non‑reactive
Silt and clay
Impurities
IS 2386 (Pt 2)
< 3% (crushed), < 10% (natural)

4. Fine aggregate grading (IS 383:2016)

Sieve
Zone I
Zone II
Zone III
Zone IV
10 mm
100
100
100
100
4.75 mm
90–100
90–100
90–100
95–100
2.36 mm
60–95
75–100
85–100
95–100
1.18 mm
30–70
55–90
75–100
90–100
600 µ
15–34
35–59
60–79
80–100
300 µ
5–20
8–30
12–40
15–50
150 µ
0–10
0–10
0–10
0–15

5. Coarse aggregate grading (typical)

Nominal size
40 mm
20 mm
10 mm
80 mm
100
—
—
40 mm
95–100
—
—
20 mm
30–70
95–100
—
10 mm
10–35
25–55
95–100
4.75 mm
0–5
0–10
0–20

6. Moisture and absorption corrections

  • Determine SSD condition before batching.
  • If dry: add water = absorption% × mass of aggregate.
  • If wet: reduce water = moisture% × mass of aggregate.
  • A 1% moisture error can change w/c by ≈ 0.02 and reduce strength by up to 8–10%.

7. Fineness modulus

FM = sum of cumulative percentage retained ÷ 100

  • Fine aggregate: 2.3–3.1
  • Coarse aggregate: 6.5–8.0

8. Common issues and fixes

Issue
Impact
Action
Excess fines
Shrinkage, cracking
Wash, re‑sieve
Poor grading
Segregation, bleeding
Blend sizes
High flakiness
Weak interlock
Limit < 30%
ASR risk
Expansion
Low‑alkali cement, pozzolans
Contaminated sand
Poor bonding
Monitor silt/clay

9. Sustainability notes

  • Prefer IS 383 compliant manufactured sand.
  • Use recycled aggregates up to 25% for non‑structural works.
  • Maintain grading via plant sensors; combine SCMs and low w/c for durability.

10. RCA guidance

Aspect
Typical guidance
Notes
Replacement level
Up to 25% for non‑structural; case‑by‑case for structural
Trial mixes required; monitor absorption
Water absorption
Higher than natural aggregates
Apply strict SSD/moisture corrections
Strength impact
Possible 5–15% reduction
Lower w/c, optimize paste, use SCMs
Durability
Potentially higher permeability
Target RCPT and water penetration limits

11. Consultant checklist

  • Obtain sieve analysis and FM for each source and batch.
  • Approve sources per IS 383 and control moisture daily.
  • Favor Zone II sand and a 20 mm + 10 mm blend for dense packing.
  • Screen new sources for ASR reactivity.

12. Standards and references

Code
Description
IS 383:2016
Specification for coarse and fine aggregates
IS 2386 (Pt 1–8)
Methods of testing aggregates
IS 2430
Sampling of aggregates
IS 1542
Sand for plaster
ASTM C33
Aggregates specification
BS 812
Testing aggregates

Disclaimer

SpecX is a neutral, brand-agnostic resource based on standards and best practices. Cross-check with project requirements and local codes before finalizing specifications.